TELEVISION REVIEW: Syfy’s Children of the Corn Hews Closer to Stephen King’s Original!


David Anders [Alias, Heroes] and Kandyse McClure [Battlestar Galactica] star as a couple nearing the end of their marriage in Syfy’s remake of Stephen King’s Children of the Corn [Saturday, 9/8C]. When Burt hits a young boy on a back toad in the middle of Nebraska, he and Vicki are shocked to discover that his throat had been cut. Burt decides they should take the boy’s body to the nearest town and turn him over to the police. Vicki, displayed extremely good judgement, thinks this is a bad idea. When they reach the nearest town, Gatlin, they find a virtual ghost town. Except for a small band of religious fanatic children, there’s no one else around for miles.

Children of the Corn is one of those film franchises that make one wonder. Why would such a boring movie spawn so many, equally boring, sequels? Now we have a TV-movie version that hews more closely to the King short story and I have to ask again, why would anyone make this?

What is creepy and atmospheric and, yes, scary, as a prose piece is simply not substantial enough to support a ninety-minute movie [which, after you subtract the commercials, is what this is]. Sure there are some great atmospheric shots of sunsets and the night skies from inside the rows of corn. There are also some great prosthetics and bodies. David Anders and Kandyse McClure also act the heck out of their roles – quite a feat when one considers that they don’t really have much to say, even when events overtake them.

Children of the Corn might work as a short feature – say forty-five minutes – but both the original and the Syfy version spend way too much time following the characters as they pound through the rows of the corn. Which is to say that even though this version stays much closer to the prose original, there’s far too much padding – and to accommodate the padding required to fill out a movie, the pacing is something less than deliberate.

If you speed up all the scenes in the corn, Children of the Corn comes in at something shy of an hour. Which is a shame because the key performances – Anders, McClure, Daniel Newman [the rebellious Malachi] and Preston Bailey [kid preacher/boy prophet] – are extremely good.

Syfy’s Children of the Corn is both better and creepier than the first movie in that lamentable franchise, but that’s not really saying a lot.

Final Grade: C-


  1. I think its decent.

  2. I liked the fact that the movie was closer to the original story, but I thought the casting stank! Those kids were not even remotely scary.

  3. It was the stupidest movie ever! What a waste of time. I kept waiting for it to get good. I wanted the man and woman to kill the children,escape from the town, and rekindle their marriage.

  4. Bahama Mama: It's not so much hatred as it is boredom to the point that I nearly fell asleep twice while I screened the movie. That di not happen when I read the original short story.

    Jay: Sometimes it can't be about the happy ending – it's better, in terms of telling horror stories esecially [read the original short story and anything by horror master H.P. Lovecraft] to not use one. There's not much that's horrifying about the supposed guys winning. In fact, that makes the whole point of the exercise, which to scare th $#!+ outta the reader/viewer kinda beside the point.

    Syfy's Children of the Corn didn't strike me as stupid – just overly long and repetitive. In short, boring.

  5. I was hoping for a good ending but it just sucks!
    And what was that thing that killed Burt?

Comments are closed.