Early on in
We are pleased to announce the launch of our Brand Spanking new television show! Which you can check out in the Washington, DC area starting the week of Jan 23rd. Please check your local listing for time and channel. If you don’t live in DC you’ll be able to catch EMTV here every week and soon on your local TV Stations.For a preview of EMTV please click one of the links below. Note – These two episodes were produced for television, therefore at the beginning you will see 30 second color bars. You can skip this in Windows Media by simply fast forwarding. The stream is geared towards dialup modems.
It’s in Windows Format, if you do not have it, you can get it by clicking Here EPISODE 6Our Holiday Movie special edition, includes reviews of Ali, Lord of The Rings, Kate and Leopold and more.Click Here To View EPISODE 7Feature reviews of The Imposter, Beautiful Minds, we preview the Count of Monte Cristo, and in Cleve’s Corner we feature “”Books on Film””. Plus we have Gary Sinease, Russell Crowe, and more…Click Here To View
Congratulations You Win Tickets to the Washington, DC Advanced Screening of “”The Count of Monte Cristo””.WHAT:Advanced Screening of “”The Count of Monte Cristo””WHERE: Mazza Gallerie, Washington, DC, 5300 Wisconsin, AveWHEN:Thursday, January 24, 2002TIME:7:30 PM—————————————————Please print this pass off by clicking the little Print Icon at the bottom of the Related Links block on the right. This pass is good for you and ONE guest only. Please arrive EARLY! Daydream Productions, Inc., will not be held responsible for overbooking of the theater.Have fun, and be sure to join the “”Count of Monte Cristo”” forum tomorrow and tell us what you thought.
Mark Dacascos is the son of Al Dacascos, Moriko McVey, and his stepmother, Malia Bernal. His father is of Filipino, Spanish, and Chinese ancestry. His mother is half-Irish and half-Japanese. Mark’s cosmopolitan mixture makes him, in his own words, a typical Hawaiian “”local boy.”” His parents ran a Martial Arts school.Many people may not know his name or even recognize the face of the Mark Dacascos, but this hot young star has starred in several projects that have garnered him rabid cult followings. Editor’s Note – Because of Mark’s recent appearance in Cradle To The Grave, I thought it’d be fun to rerun this exclusive interview that I did.
Those projects include “”The Crow: A Stairway to Heaven”” which was quickly building a huge fan base in syndication, when due to corporate politics the show was inexplicably cancelled. While his films include, the overseas cult classic “”Crying Freeman”” and now his latest film “”Brotherhood of the Wolf””, an international hit that is now coming to these shores. He’s built himself quite an impressive list of credits and his future looks bright. Mark is a man who seems to be both content with his career and his family life. Not bad for a man who had no ambitions on becoming an actor and was actually discovered while walking down a street in China Town. Ironically enough the man who discovered him was Chris Lee, who then went on to run Tri-Star Pictures and produce the film Final Fantasy. You can actually read an interview that I did with Chris last year. I recently conducted an interview with Mark, who called me from his California home. The interview went a little something like this:EMOk, let me start by asking you my standard, overly broad question, who are you and tell us why we’re here?MDMy name is Mark Dacascos, and I play the character of Mani in a new film called “”The Brotherhood of The Wolf””. Mani is a “”mythical”” warrior who fights for what he believes in and he represents the balance between man and nature. EMYour life and background, much like this film seems to defy categorization. How would you describe this film?MD It’s a mix of a lot of different genres, including Mystery, Suspense, Horror, 17th Century French Period drama. Director Christopher Gans has created a film that is truly originaland is a visionary masterpiece. What’s even more amazing is, the basic premise of the film is based on real life events. Their really was a “”Beast of Gevaudan”” that scared the King and caused political unrest in 17th Century France.EMWhat was your impression when you first read the script?MDI signed on to this project before I Christopher Gans even wrote the script. We went out to dinner one night and he told me about this idea that he had for this movie. Through the course of a 2 1/2 hour meal he laid out the entire story for me and what my character would be doing I was blown away by it. It seemed to work so well at blending all these various genres. He did such a great job of selling me on this film that I signed on, even before he started the script. When I finally read it, I couldn’t put it down and the ending was a real surprise to me. EMYou were the spiritual heart of the film. Yet you didn’t really say that much in it. How difficult was it to play a part like this?MDWhen you are not working with much verbal dialog, it forces you as an actor, to become more in tune with every other part of your physical body. How you move, your facial expressions, everything. The slightest gesture or look that you make ends up speaking volumes. I worked with someone from the Indian Tribe and she [Editor’s note, I don’t want to butcher the name of Mark’s Trainer, so forgive me for not mentioning it here] taught me a lot about their beliefs and how they feel about the nature and interact with their surroundings. I really felt like I became part of their culture.EMHow did you end up meeting her?MDI met her through my agent.EMDid you get a chance to visit any real reservations? What were your impressions?MDNo, I didn’t. But I would certainly like to visit one someday.EMWhat kind of performance do you find harder? One like you had in “”The Crow: Stairway to Heaven””, where you were the star and had a lot of dialog, or a film like this where you are not the star, but the spiritual heart of it?MDI think they both have their strengths and weaknesses. When playing a part like Mani, you are forced to pay more attention to the nuances of your performance than you do when play a part like Eric Draven [The lead character in “”The Crow””.] The fun thing about doing “”The Crow”” was learning how to play the guitar, working with a large cast, learning new lines, etc.EMDo you think doing a role like this improves your acting?MDYes, definitely. EMHow would you compare this experience with Christopher Gans to the last time you worked with him?MDThey were both the same. The only real difference was the larger budget, our editor was from Holland, our fight choreographer was from Japan, etc…We had a large international crew working with us. EMWould you categorize him as more of an Actor’s Director or a Technical Director?MDHe’s definitely both. He works really well with the technical crew, and knows how to handle actors. He’s the type of guy who loves to have fun on the set and loves what he’s doing.EMIn a recent interview with Christopher Gans, he said that he wrote this part specifically for you. Why do you think he did that?MDI don’t know, we worked well together in his first film “”Crying Freeman”” and I think there are lots of similarities between myself and Mani. EMTo me the character of Eric Draven in “”The Crow””, and Mani are similar yet different. In terms of how they view life it’s from completely different perspectives, but in their interactions with people it seems the same. Would you say this is true? If so, are you like this in real life?MDI would say there are similarities. Both characters are extremely spiritual beings. When Mani takes off his clothes and only uses a knife, while others are putting on heavy armor, he’s trying to become one with nature because he feels that it’ll make him a better warrior. He has a deep connection with a higher being. I’m someone who loves nature and would like to think that the best parts of each of these characters personalities, are reflected in me as well. I like to believe that, I do bring a little something of myself to each character that I play. Both characters are also Martial Artist.EMHow long have you practiced Martial Arts?MDMy parents ran a Martial Arts school, so I’ve been training since I was a young boy.EMTime flies when you’re having fun, looks like it’s time to end the interview, let me ask you two really quick questions. What happened to the television show? Are there plans to bring it back? What are your future plans? Ok, it’s actually three.MDI don’t know what happened with the show. Our ratings really started to go up when there was a shakeup in the Network. The new brass wanted to have a clean slate, so our show got unexpectedly pulled at the end of the first season. There was talk a few years ago about possibly bringing it back, at the time I was interested in such a prospect. Recently I heard rumors that it may come back yet again; unfortunately it’ll have to be without me, as I’m pretty content with the direction that my life is going right now. I wish them well, and hope they succeed in bringing it back. EMI hope so too, I thought it was just hitting its stride when it was cancelled. What are you going to be doing for the next few years?MDI currently don’t have any immediate plans, just waiting to see what the reaction is to Brotherhood and looking for other fun and interesting projects to do.EMLet me squeeze in one more question before you have to leave. Brotherhood is starting to generate some really good buzz. What are your expectations for this film?MDI really don’t know, it’s such a strange mix of genres, that I’m curious myself to see what the American reaction is.by Michelle AlexandriaJanuary 23, 2002
Born without immunities, Jimmy Livingston (Jake Gyllenhall) grew up in a sanitized plastic bubble, sheltered from what his overprotective mother (Swoosie Kurtz) tells him is a germ-infested world. But Jimmy’s thin sheet of plastic can’t contain his emotions, and he falls head over high tops for his gorgeous next-door neighbor, Chloe (Marley Shelton).
One afternoon, following a discussion about the legendary “”Bubble Boy”” with her immature friends, Chloe pays Jimmy a visit out of curiosity and the two become friends. It’s painfully obvious, though, that Jimmy’s condition will prevent him giving Chloe the ultimate gift of physical contact. She eventually seeks solace in someone else, a less attractive jerk who uses her for her good looks. Now Jimmy, who has never been out of his house, has three days to get from California to New York and stop the girl of his dreams from marrying the wrong guy. Disregard any comparisons to John Travolta’s sappy 1976 television tearjerker, “”The Boy in the Plastic Bubble.”” Instead, Touchstone Pictures, the bastard child of the Disney family responsible for classic trash like “”Coyote Ugly”” and “”Play It to the Bone,”” has produced a loud, offensive, stereotypical road trip comedy that, despite all of its imperfections, manages to be extremely loveable and foolishly entertaining. “”Bubble Boy”” does stretch its premise a bit thin just to fill a 90 minute movie, and the inconsistencies become hard to swallow after a while. The humor, as well, can be offensive, stooping to take cheap shots at everything from organized religion to the chinese accent. Thankfully the film has a heart that swells as big as Jimmy
The nerve of Mandy Moore. After a brief but memorable turn as the one-dimensional vixen supporting Garry Marshall’s “”The Princess Diaries,”” this chart-topper-cum-actress has gone and landed herself the type of role most teen actors would scrap their series on the WB for.
Moore signed on to play Jamie Sullivan – a reverend’s daughter who falls for an “”other side of the tracks”” boy – in the cinematic version of Nicholas Sparks’ best-selling book, “”A Walk To Remember.”” Just don’t act too surprised by this bubblegum diva’s transformation, as Mandy warns, “”I think this character is a lot more like me than most people asking that question think sometimes.”” Do tell, Miss Moore. Do tell: EM I watched the trailer for “”A Walk to Remember”” before a screening a few weeks ago, and hardly recognized you. Was this makeover a conscious effort to ditch the perception of “”Mandy Moore””?Mandy Moore: It was not a conscious effort. I had a small role in the “”Princess Diaries”” this past summer, and I just figured I would continue to do supporting roles until I felt really comfortable, to kind of venture out and do a part like this. But I was such a huge fan of the book, that I knew I couldn’t let this opportunity pass by. Forget it, I love this story, and I may not know as much about movies as the next actress, in terms of what constitutes the good script, but I knew scripts like this were few and far between.EM So you didn’t run the script by anyone for final approval? MM No, I loved the book so much and I was like, forget it, regardless of whether it’s going to be successful or not, I have to be a part of it. EM It certainly is a big step, jumping from one supporting role to your first leading role. Did you feel any pressure to succeed, that this film was sitting squarely on your shoulders?MM Oh, absolutely. I mean, it was a completely different type of film, and obviously having a bigger role (laughs) kind of adds a little bit of pressure. Initially getting over that shock was kind of hard, but after that, everything was fine. I got to that point where it all felt really comfortable. Plus, I colored my hair. I got rid of being Mandy for two months, and that definitely helpful.EM But you didn’t have a Garry Marshall in your corner this time out. Was he missed?MM Well, I went and met (the director) Adam Shankman, and I had lunch with him long before I even went and auditioned for the part. And I knew that finding someone who was as passionate about conveying the message of this story was going to be tough. But once I met Adam, I was like, “”Wow, this is someone who reallygets it, and who’s really excited to share this movie with everyone.”” And so I knew that I wanted to work with him. And Adam, truthfully, helped me so much on the movie. Especially in the beginning, getting me to some of the places. But once we got through the first three or four days of shooting, you just completely … you’re there.EM So how familiar were you with Sparks’ novel before you even heard they were going to make a movie out of the material? How far in advance were you involved?MM Probably a year.EM And you claim to have related to the Jamie character, even when you were reading the book the first time through.MM There’s a lot of me in Jamie, and a lot of Jamie in me. I think the fact that at first, I’m kind of a shy, introverted person when I first meet people. And I think that’s how Jamie comes across, because she doesn’t feel the need to kind of express herself all the time, and have many friends. I think the fact that we’re both kind of spunky, too. People describe Jamie as spunky, and I’ve been described as spunky before. I like that. That adjective is kind of fun.The thing that I wanted to learn through this movie, or get out of playing Jamie, was that she was so comfortable in her own skin, [and] that’s something I haven’t felt. Despite all of the stereotypes, and judgement against her in school, it didn’t change the way she felt about herself, and I thought that would be amazing, even to kind of just pretend I had that going for me for a couple of months. EM It’s also a rare quality to see in a teenage character. Unfortunately, teen characters seldom are portrayed that way.MM Right, especially someone who is the “”outcast”” of the film. You typically see that she’s self-conscious, or that she – or even the boy in the film – has to physically transform themselves in the end to gain acceptance and appease the person that they’re in the relationship with, or whatever. It was nice to have a female heroine, or even a guy, who didn’t have to go through that. No one did. In fact, I was the only character in the film that was consistent with who she was and what she did with her life throughout the entire movie, and it was kind of everyone around her changing.EM The book is set in the 1950s, but the film is not. What did the film lose or gain by updating to the ’90s?MM There are things I think it lost, but it would have been a completely different film if it were set in the ’50s. Besides the obvious, I think its a little more reasonable for people my age to go see it. It would have been a cuter movie, and a littlesweeter, to see it set in the ’50s.EM Would you have attempted the role if it were set in the ’50s?MM (Emphatically) Yes, because I just loved the book so much.EM But would it have been as effective?MM To teenagers? No. I don’t think it would have been as effective if it were set in the ’50s then if it were set here.EM Perhaps the studio could have marketed it to adults, in that case.MM Yes, but I think adults are still going to want to come see this film, because they’ve read the book and the main story and the main message is still there. EM Now, the message “”Walk”” delivers does resemble that of other teen movies – poor girl meets popular guy … How do you differentiate your film from the competition?MM We don’t have to rely on selling ourselves as having sex, drugs and rock & roll in a teen movie for once, which is great. There’s actually something to learn from this movie. You’re going to walk out and not feel like you’ve wasted an hour and 45 minutes of your life, watching the same old, same old. I was so moved by the book, and I was hoping that the movie could capture that, too. And I really think it has. Maybe in a different way, because there are some differences, but I just know teens are going to walk out and think about faith. And not necessarily in a spiritual connotation, but just faith in general. Like in each other. And in love. Especially young love. SO It’s a unique theme, faith.MM And it’s so taboo in Hollywood to even mention it. Anything to do with spirituality or religion has been so “”not politically correct”” to talk about. It’s nice that it’s done in a way that’s not forced [in this movie], and it’s not preachy and in your face. Like, “”This is what I believe in, and if you don’t, then you are very, very wrong.””EM The film shot in Wilmington, N.C., a hotbed for Hollywood activity. Any run-ins with the “”Dawson’s Creek”” crowd?MM Shane [West, Mandy’s co-star] did. Shane ran in to Joshua Jackson a lot. Ashley Judd came down for my birthday, to wish me a Happy Birthday. She was in [Wilmington] filming the “”Ya Ya Sisterhood.”” And Vince Vaughn and everyone, filming “”Domestic Disturbance.””EM So, no bar fights?MM I was not out that night (laughs). I think I was actually out of town. But it got a little crazy. Some of the locals were unhappy that there were these hot young actors there. Tempers flared … it was crazy. But still, I love Wilmington so much.EM It’s becoming very popular:MM We call it “”Wilmie-wood.”” My goodness. Outside of N.Y. and L.A., it’s like the biggest epicenter for making films. I would do another movie there in a heartbeat. In fact, I’ll read a script extra carefully and make sure I found something that I loved about it if I knew it were filming in Wilmington.EM Really? What’s the selling point?MM The town, and the charms that it has. The fact that people understand that we’re here for, well, sometimes a long amount of time filming a movie. And they’re very accommodating. You feel like you’re in the South! You can go get some sweet tea. It was so right up my alley. The food … the shopping, wonderful restaurants. It was like a vacation for two-and-a-half months.By Sean O’ConnellJan. 18, 2002
For years actor Paul Bettany has been making waves on the London film scene starring in such cutting edge films as “”Dead Babies””, “”Gangster No. 1″”, “”Bent”” and others. Now he is about to explode onto the American film scene. In his first major American movie, Columbia Picture’s, “”A Knight’s Tale””, he gives an over the top, hysterically funny performance as Geoffrey Chaucer: an oft-naked, unknown writer and compulsive gambler. Paul almost steals the movie from Heath Ledger (The Patriot). Paul’s Chaucer dazzles the crowd and the movie going audience with his glowing introductions, hip attitude, and quick wit. Note, This interview was done several years ago, before “”A Beautiful Mind,”” and of course “”Master and Commander”” was released. Paul is yet another EM Find, who is now part of Hollywood’s “”B”” List
He is currently shooting his second major film “”A Beautiful Minds”” produced and directed by A-List director, Ron Howard and stars Oscar winner Russell Crowe. We would say, that Paul’s future doesn’t just look bright, it glows.We recently had a chance to sit down and have one of our famous EM chats with Paul about his career and his experiences working with, “”A Knight’s Tale”” writer/director Brian Helgeland who also won an Oscar for his screenplay, “”L.A. Confidential””.EMLet’s start this interview with my standard overly broad question. Tell us who you are and why we are speaking with you today.PaulI’m here because I’m doing a press tour of “”A Knight’s Tale””. I’ve been traveling up and down the East Coast doing publicity for the film.EMHow long did it take you guys to make “”A Knight’s Tale””?PaulWe finished it last summer. I’m currently filming a new Ron Howard movie called “”A Beautiful Mind”” in New York with Russell Crowe. In this film Russell Crowe plays John Nash a mathematician who won the noble prize for economics that has a troubled life. I play his best friend.EMWhat is it like to go from playing the role of Geoff Chaucer, which is so over the top comedic to doing something as serious as this?PaulThe extraordinary thing is, that I’ve never played a good guy before. In London I always played the bad guy, or a gangster, so it’s strange that in my first American film, I’m playing this good guy.EMWhich is harder for you playing a good guy or a bad guy?PaulWell normally playing a bad guy is so much more fun. Although playing Chaucer was a lot of fun as well.EMHow much of “”A Knight’s Tale”” was adlibbed?PaulThe entire film was scripted. Brian Helgeland (the writer of “”L.A. Confidential””) is such a brilliant writer, that there wasn’t much adlibbing needed. Although, the line “”I’ll be here for the entire week”” was mine.EMIf you only played bad guys in London, how did you land this choice role?PaulBrian Helgeland is a dear friend of mine. He asked me if I wanted to play the role of Chaucer. When he sent me the script, he included a picture of a dwarf. At that point I threw out all pretensions and preconceived notions of doing any research or about what type of film this would be.EMHow did you guys manage to come up with those great introductions?PaulThe introductions were kind of modeled after a John Lennon performance that he once gave in London, where the Queen was in attendance. He stood up and jokingly said, this performance is also for all the people in the “”cheap seats in the back.”” It was that type of irreverence and “”shock”” value that we wanted to get at. We thought that how Geoff Chaucer would deliver his introductions.EMYour introductions where so hysterically funny and memorable – it truly made the movie.PaulI’m glad you liked it. Some things we made up on the spot, like the “”I’ll be here for the rest of the week””, but Brian is a very great writer. His words fall out of your mouth so easily. He gets all the credit for the introductions.EMCome on, you have to take some credit for your performance. Don’t give it all to the writer/director.Paul[Laughs] Ok, I made it all up and I scripted the entire movie! Seriously though, he’s a really great writer and we had an enormous amount of fun doing it.EMHow did you get your start in acting?PaulI started off in the London theater scene, where I stared in a play written by another brilliant writer name Joe Penhall. I was working a lot before this performance, but this play was what started things off for me.EMHow would you compare making American movies to London films?PaulAll film sets are almost entirely the same; they all have the same feel about them. The only difference is, and I assume it’s because of the enormous amount of money that go into American films, is the desperation and panic in the producers voices. EMSo you don’t find it anymore pleasurable to work on a major Hollywood film versus a smaller independent?PaulI really don’t know yet. The first film [“”A Knight’s Tale””] was such a joy to make because I was working for a dear friend and this one [the Ron Howard film] is such a serious subject, about schizophrenia. I haven’t had to sell my soul yet, to work. I just finished working in Spain on a film with William Dafoe. It was really difficult because we only had 2 1/2 months to make it and we needed four, and we didn’t have enough money. It was a real learning experience.EMHow long did it take to make “”A Knight’s Tale””?PaulIt took 4 1/2 months to shoot and we had two crews shooting in different locations simultaneously. Which was a lot of shooting.EMSo was there a lot of material left on the editing room floor?PaulYes, there was an enormous amount. Which I’m sure will find it’s way onto the DVD. In the original cut there were at least two more of my introductions that didn’t make the final cut.EMOf course on the DVD, there will be an option where we can watch just your introductions. As an actor how difficult is it to go from a film like “”A Knight’s Tale”” where you were really good friends with the writer/director and the type of film that it is, to something as dark and serious as “”A Beautiful Minds””?PaulI don’t know. [thinks] I guess one is more taxing than the other. Making “”A Knight’s Tale”” was long hard work, but it was such a joy that you didn’t notice. While making something like “”Gangster Number 7″” or “”Morality Play”” was just harder work.EMDo you find it more emotionally draining to do a serious role, or do you know how to separate your own personal feelings from what you are doing?PaulIt’s a difficult question to answer. When talking about the craft of acting you come across as sounding like an ass. You either say, “”it’s at the vanguard of changing people’s emotions…”” or you say, “”it’s better than working.”” Neither of which is really true. [Pauses] Even if you are doing a really intense scene with someone, you still have to remain a little playful otherwise I’ll stop listening. [Thinks] Or let’s put it this way, if you are in a Country House, alone, lying in bed, you hear a creak, it’s very easy to convince yourself that someone else is in that house and you get scared. It’s very simple, there’s no magic involved. If you are playing a character for two days where you are pretending to stab someone in the eye with a corkscrew, it’s hard not to feel a little odd by that. It takes a little time to come down off of something like that.EMDo you think a lot of actors have trouble separating the two?PaulI’ve worked with some actors who get so involved with what they are doing that they do take it home with them. I would suspect it is very painful for them. Taking off your clothes in the middle of the Czech Republic [He spends half of his time in “”A Knight’s Tale”” running around naked] is humiliating but I’m getting paid a lot of money and it’s better than working in a mind shaft somewhere.EMHow long did it take you to get comfortable with it?PaulYou never do. You never do!
Since the audience patiently awaiting the release of “”American Pie 2″” on DVD probably refuses to read lengthy tomes on the merits of the cinema, let me get right to the point: if you enjoyed the first “”Pie,”” you’re guaranteed to gobble up its superior sequel with a spoon. Those who care to find out why may continue.
“”Pie 2″” delivers much more of the same sex-soaked “”hilarity”” we were fed in the first film, but it also focuses its lens back on the guys who started it all: long-faced Kevin (Thomas Ian Nicholas), dreamy jock Oz (Chris Klein), eccentric Finch (Eddie Kaye Thomas) and hapless Jim (Jason Biggs). The script, penned by David H. Steinberg and “”Pie”” scribe Adam Herz, accomplishes this by shuttling the female characters from the first film out of the spotlight. They’re not quite afterthoughts, but they’re nowhere near as important as they were in the first jumbled film. This leaves the guys, along with frustrated friend Steve Stifler (Seann William Scott), on their own, so they opt to rent a cabin on nearby Lake Michigan and make the most of their first summer as college men. The script, however, doesn’t give them much to do. Oz practices overseas phone sex with his absent mate, Heather (mena Suvari). Kevin characteristically moans and sighs over his blown chances with Vicky (Tara Reid). And Finch, preparing for his anticipated reunion with Stifler’s mom (Jennifer Coolidge), discovers the art of tantric sex. Of all of them, it’s Jim who grows up. His quest to sexually satisfy Nadia steers him right into the arms of another, but not before he’s forced to jump through the requisite series of embarrassing scenarios that involve everything from porno tapes and quick-drying glue to a trombone and a retarded summer camper. What more did you expect from a kid who humped pastry?Who knows? With the next “”Pie”” film – and there’s bound to be another – screenwriter Herz may turn his attention to Finch, a goldmine of idiosyncrasies just begging to be analyzed. Or maybe Kevin will be given a reason to exist, as he lacks one now. Time will tell. Until then, it’s the ability of the four guys to rise above the barrage of bodily fluids required to make a comedy fly in today’s desensitized marketplace that will continue to lure us back. I certainly wouldn’t mind checking back with this crew every other summer to see how far they’ve come.GRADE: BTHE EXTRASThe
THIS CONTEST IS NOW CLOSED. Come and hang with the EM gang, and meet the hosts of the new EMTV show. You can be the first to see Touchstone Pictures, “”The Count of Monte Cristo”” starring, Jim Caviezel, and Guy Pearce. The screening will be held in Washington, DC Thursday, January 24, 2002, at our super secret location. To qualify to win simply read the synopsis below and follow the instructions. We will notify the winners on Wednesday January 23, 2002. The film is rated PG-13. “”The Count of Monte Cristo”” opens on Friday, January 25, 2002.
Based on the classic Alexandre Dumas novel, THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO is a classic story of an innocent man wrongly but deliberately imprisoned and his brilliant strategy for revenge against those who betrayed him. Dashing young sailor Edmond Dantes (JIM CAVIEZEL) is an honest young man whose peaceful life and plans to marry the beautiful Mercedes (DAGMARA DOMINCZYK) are abruptly shattered when his best friend Fernand (GUY PEARCE), who wants Mercedes for himself, deceives him. Unlawfully sentenced to the infamous island prison of Chateau D
Actor Tobey Maguire, who portrays the title character in director Sam Raimi’s highly-anticipated “”Spider-Man”” movie — is signed to a deal that locks him in to two sequels.
The first film, which also stars Kristen Dunst and Willem Dafoe, is due on May 3. The contract calls for a second “”Spider-Man”” film in January 2003, according to Variety reports. If the first movie hits it big, as anticipation seems to suggest, the option on the sequels will almost certainly be exercised. So viewers should expect a “”Spider-Man 2″” in January if 2003.