The internet just exploded with excitement when the trailer for Sandra Bullock, and George Clooney‘s latest flick – Gravity hit. People were spooging themselves, using phrases like “life altering,” “stunning,” “changes the very fabric of cinema,” etc. This was just for the trailer. After a week of hype, I watched the trailer thinking to myself “I didn’t get it. It’s two people floating in space for two minutes.
Director Alfonso Cuarón (one of the most overrated and overpraised directors in years) has crafted a small, well-told story that takes place in an enclosed environment within a sparse 90-minutes. After a Russian Satellite explodes (those damn Russians are villains even when they don’t mean to be!) the space debris hits the orbiting American space station/satellite that Ryan Stone (Bullock) and Matt Kowalski (Clooney) are working on.
There are moments in the film that are gripping, but once you get past the basic idea that they are stranded in space and they have 90 minutes to reach a Chinese Satellite before they run out of air, the movie becomes a bit pedestrian. The setup is nicely done, but there’s nowhere for it to really go and the ending was ridiculous – I expected someone to scream “You blew it up!” We watch the inexperienced Stone panic and bumble her way through getting back to her space station. There are really nice moments where you do get a sense of weightlessness and feel tension.
Like the trailer, the movie is – two people floating in space for 90-minutes. I guess there must be some sort of male, porn fantasy going on here that eludes me. Is the movie ok? Yes. Is it, to paraphrase, James Cameron “The Best Space Movie Evah?” Heck no, not even close. Are Bullock and Clooney good? Yes, at being Bullock and Clooney, but I didn’t really see them stretching themselves too much and I never really bought the idea of Bullock and Clooney as Astronauts.
From a purely visual standpoint, there is nothing in this film that haven’t been shown in a million other films set in space, only films like Sunshine and Moon actually had more compelling characters. The 3D was nicely done and richly detailed, but 3D against black backgrounds looses something.
I’m not saying I didn’t like the narrative thrust of this film but there’s not enough meat here to make me think it’d be something I’d be excited to watch again. Writers Alfonso Cuarón, and Jonás Cuarón provided a very nice, easy to digest story that doesn’t have any hidden layers to it. In some ways I wish they included flashbacks so that we could discover more about Ryan and Matt, on the other hand I’m glad they didn’t. It helped maintain the momentum of the story. The film is very situational and not character driven. This is not “epic” or “revolutionary” film-making, it is just merely good.
http://www.safeembrace.org/mdrx/is-it-illegal-to-buy-cialis-on-craigslist/68/ thesis motivation enter site https://nyusternldp.blogs.stern.nyu.edu/how-do-i-change-my-sky-email-password-on-my-ipad/ levitra northville rhetorical analysis essay writing sites au cost of doxycycline at cvs cialis side effects death how do i find out ipad screen size lisinopril 20 mg generic cialis does work essays http://bookclubofwashington.org/books/research-proposal-sample/14/ menor preo de viagra warrants in an argumentative essay research papers on renewable energy cialis sewickley go english model essay essay about friendship memories https://sigma-instruments.com/viagra-get-high-12847/ https://www.arohaphilanthropies.org/heal/viagra-masticable-chile/96/ https://www.nationalautismcenter.org/letter/learning-styles-essay/26/ help with my philosophy home work tterm paper help related 28 txt 28 o que pode causar o uso do viagra http://www.chesszone.org/lib/writing-workshop-1647.html https://medpsychmd.com/nurse/viagra-200mg/63/ essay writing student and social service does medicare part d cover levitra source site natural viagra plus Finale Grade C