<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DVD REVIEW: Sports Night: The complete series: 10th Anniversary Edition &#8211;What Rare Wonderment!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eclipsemagazine.com/dvd/6772/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eclipsemagazine.com/dvd/6772/</link>
	<description>Entertainment News Network</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sheldon A. Wiebe</title>
		<link>http://eclipsemagazine.com/dvd/6772/comment-page-1/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon A. Wiebe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclipsemagazine.com/announcements/6772/dvd-review-sports-night-the-complete-series-10th-anniversary-edition-what-rare-wonderment/#comment-3009</guid>
		<description>I listen to commentary tracks to learn about the making of the film/tv episode for which the commentary is recorded - anecdotes are welcome, but not to the point that they're all that's there. 

The commentaries I found to be so-so revealed virtually nothing about the making of those episodes. Sure it's cool to hear Josh &#38; Joshua talk about the permanent floating poker game, but I'm looking for insights into the episodes - and the making of the series in general.

The two commentaries by Aaron Sorkin and Tommy Schlamme address the making of the show - and the episodes for which the commentaries were recorded. The commentary by Janet Ashikaga is, likewise, informative.

Hence I find them to be more relevant as commentaries than those that are just people talking about poker, or whatever. Commentaries that are all about anecdotes are simply not worth my time - just as overly technical commentaries can be boring.

The Sorkin/Schlamme commentaries are a combination of the two, in a reasonably good ratio. The fact that they give each other a few compliments here and there comes from theor working together and becoming friends. Also, their compliments are based on actual quality of their accomplishments - quality that has bee recognized by critics and millions of viewers. And Sorkin created Sports Night by the time he was 25 [and wrote the vast majority of the forty-five eps]. He is, in fact, a genius - and if something is true, it's neither boasting nor egoboo. Same for Schlamme who is one of the best and most in demand directors in TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listen to commentary tracks to learn about the making of the film/tv episode for which the commentary is recorded - anecdotes are welcome, but not to the point that they&#8217;re all that&#8217;s there. </p>
<p>The commentaries I found to be so-so revealed virtually nothing about the making of those episodes. Sure it&#8217;s cool to hear Josh &amp; Joshua talk about the permanent floating poker game, but I&#8217;m looking for insights into the episodes - and the making of the series in general.</p>
<p>The two commentaries by Aaron Sorkin and Tommy Schlamme address the making of the show - and the episodes for which the commentaries were recorded. The commentary by Janet Ashikaga is, likewise, informative.</p>
<p>Hence I find them to be more relevant as commentaries than those that are just people talking about poker, or whatever. Commentaries that are all about anecdotes are simply not worth my time - just as overly technical commentaries can be boring.</p>
<p>The Sorkin/Schlamme commentaries are a combination of the two, in a reasonably good ratio. The fact that they give each other a few compliments here and there comes from theor working together and becoming friends. Also, their compliments are based on actual quality of their accomplishments - quality that has bee recognized by critics and millions of viewers. And Sorkin created Sports Night by the time he was 25 [and wrote the vast majority of the forty-five eps]. He is, in fact, a genius - and if something is true, it&#8217;s neither boasting nor egoboo. Same for Schlamme who is one of the best and most in demand directors in TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fulfy</title>
		<link>http://eclipsemagazine.com/dvd/6772/comment-page-1/#comment-3003</link>
		<dc:creator>fulfy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclipsemagazine.com/announcements/6772/dvd-review-sports-night-the-complete-series-10th-anniversary-edition-what-rare-wonderment/#comment-3003</guid>
		<description>Hey. Totally agree with you about the dvd's being a must-buy. I couldn't disagree more on the commentaries, though. Most of the ones you loved struck me as little more than self-congratulatory love-fests. The tracks with Josh Charles and Joshua Malina (Stormy Weather and Kafelnikov, I think) are far and away the most entertaining. It's like hanging out with old friends. LOVED them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey. Totally agree with you about the dvd&#8217;s being a must-buy. I couldn&#8217;t disagree more on the commentaries, though. Most of the ones you loved struck me as little more than self-congratulatory love-fests. The tracks with Josh Charles and Joshua Malina (Stormy Weather and Kafelnikov, I think) are far and away the most entertaining. It&#8217;s like hanging out with old friends. LOVED them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
