If you are meaning my comment about having reservations about how Dean is being dropped into the mytharc, then the best I can tell you is that I always have major reservations about ‘time travel episodes’ as means for characters to see what is going on and how it affects them.

The commentaries I found to be so-so revealed virtually nothing about the making of those episodes. Sure it’s cool to hear Josh & Joshua talk about the permanent floating poker game, but I’m looking for insights into the episodes - and the making of the series in general.

The two commentaries by Aaron Sorkin and Tommy Schlamme address the making of the show - and the episodes for which the commentaries were recorded. The commentary by Janet Ashikaga is, likewise, informative.

Hence I find them to be more relevant as commentaries than those that are just people talking about poker, or whatever. Commentaries that are all about anecdotes are simply not worth my time - just as overly technical commentaries can be boring.

The Sorkin/Schlamme commentaries are a combination of the two, in a reasonably good ratio. The fact that they give each other a few compliments here and there comes from theor working together and becoming friends. Also, their compliments are based on actual quality of their accomplishments - quality that has bee recognized by critics and millions of viewers. And Sorkin created Sports Night by the time he was 25 [and wrote the vast majority of the forty-five eps]. He is, in fact, a genius - and if something is true, it’s neither boasting nor egoboo. Same for Schlamme who is one of the best and most in demand directors in TV.

The episode sounds *great.* Is it emotional? Is it gut wrenching? Are the performances great? Are there twists, turns, and reveals that will break my heart? I enjoy being treated like an adult by the writers. Bring it on, Supernatural writers! Bring it on!

But if Kripke has pinned all of Sam’s troubles on Dean, who has only ever sought to care for this family and make sure they were safe and happy at his own great expense, then it’ll just be too painful to care about these characters anymore. I thought we were finally getting some HOPE on this show. Torturing your leads is fine, to a point. But there comes a time when it’s just too much, it’s just too horrible, and I didn’t come into this show because I wanted to watch the primetime ghostbusting equivalent of a snuff film.

I’m hoping I read you wrong, and that this isn’t what he’s done. Because if it is, my three-year love affair with Supernatural is finished.

http://www.supportsupernatural.com

Unfortunately, Criminal Minds remains one of the worst shows ever to be a hit in the history of television. The writing isn’t just bad, it’s exploitative [and not in the fun way of exploitation movies, but rather, the exploitation of women - usually through the torture of serial killer victims being played out onscreen, though this time it was through grotesque injuries to a woman from being skipped along a street turning her back into hamburger. Men rarely suffer physical abuse of the kind and proportion that women do - and that makes the show misogynist as well as poorly written. And Thomas Gibson's acting is so wooden that he makes Robert Beltran, of Star Trek: Voyager look like Olivier. Plus, Garcia got it right when she asked Morgan why it was always him who had to play hero - a riff that was boring by the end of season one.

I actually liked the show when it was called "UnSub" back in 1989. The plots were remarkably varied and the writing brilliant. Overall, the cast was vastly superior as well. If it ever comes out on DVD, you might want to check it out. It shows how a show of this nature should be done. Of course, it didn't pander to a lowest common denominator audience, so it got axed after one season, but that one season was infinitely better than the best ep of Criminal Minds. In fact, I find myself wondering why the creators of UnSub haven't sued the creators of Criminal Minds for not only ripping them off, but turning what was a terriific concept and running it into the ground.

As for not saying anything, well CBS sends me screeners and they expect me to review them. You'll note that I've also reviewed The Mentalist [a vastly more intelligent and well written series], as well. “It’s not what I thought it should be” isn’t a review, it’s a meaningless phrase that utterly fails to express the loathing I feel for the show and the episode being reviewed - and there’s no point in writing a review if I don’t call ‘em like I see ‘em. That’s my job.

AJ Cook plays JJ Jareau and Garica is played by Kirsten Vangsness.
So you know what if you don’t like the show don’t say anything bad about it just say that it wasn’t what you thought it should be and leave it at that.

I can just picture him bounding in late, apologising and trying to make it up to everyone in the short space of time available. He’s known for his excellent manners and does try to give you his full attention when he’s talking to you. His height is something everyone comments on when they first meet him! You know he’s going to be tall, but he still takes you by surprise.

I enjoyed both your writing and your observations and look forward to reading more from you.

The writer also refer to the subject of their interview by his full name, Jared Padalecki, no less than ten times during this piece. That is just lazy writing. We know who they’re talking about. They don’t have to keep repeating it just because they can’t take the time to find other ways to refer to the person being interviewed. So much repetition is just boring and makes the article sound stilted and dull.

It tone it sounds, at times, more like fangirl gushing than serious reporting. The comments about the “shrug of his broad shoulders” and his rising up to his “full and very impressive 6′4″ height” had me laughing out loud. Give me a break. They’re not writing for Tiger Beat!

I have no idea how long this person has been “reporting”, but I wasn’t impressed. They may be able to put words on paper, but that doesn’t necessarily make them a writer.

Jared Padalecki did NOT say ‘his Dean’. He said ‘his brother Dean’. It was my error in editing that left the word ‘brother’ out of the quote.

GRADE = “B+”

I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting….

GRADE = “C+”

Chantilla

I’m sorry to see it go, I love the team and have enjoyed Woolsey in command quite a bit.

GRADE = “B-”

Then you have Bullseye and this cartoon bad guy who goes around killing people left and right. Someone like that would not last very long. He kills people in airports and pubs. I mean, come on. I know this is a comic book movie but it strains credulity.

Elektra was an assassin in the comics, which is why she’s a great martial artist with Sais. There is no reason for her to have a costume in this movie and Sais, she’s just some rich guy’s daughter. No explanation why she’s a bad ass.

And how is the Kingpin going to make her father look like the Kingpin to the cops if he has him assassinated? Huh? That never gets explained either.

The movie is full of stupidity like this and bad acting and dialog. It’s the Simple Jack of Marvel movies.

And no, the director’s cut doesn’t make it much better. It just ads more stupidity like Coolio as another dumb crook.

GRADE = “C+”

Click Here…

GRADE = “B”

GRADE = “C”

GRADE = “A-”

Chartreuxus

And LOL at the comments above.
Major points for not hiring a blonde teeny? This is just another barbie doll with darker hair. And fake lips.
Vomit.

And unfortunately this fool will come to the show. You will see how the whole gang will promote this new b!tch at Comicon. How she’s great and fans gonna love her.
And maybe that other new hot barbie, Pamela. I bet she’s great too, even better than Sam and Dean.

As you seem to know what your doing blogging wise, do you know what the best time of the week is to blog and have them read?…

GRADE = A+

GRADE = “B+”